1 of 10 UC Berkeley: Gary Taubes 11/7/2007

Watch this great video about weight loss

and fat burning tips

Listen to Jeff explain the safe and easy way to burn fat and lose weight

www.diet-blog.com www.imminst.org The Quality of Calories: What Makes Us Fat and Why Nobody Seems to Care November 27, 2007, 04:00PM Sibley Auditorium View watch webcast Gary Taubes is a science journalist who has been published in the Atlantic Monthly, Discover, Esquire, GQ, Science, and many others. He has won the National Association of Science Writers Science in Society Award three times. His 2001 article, “The Soft Science of Dietary Fat,” published in Science, was followed by “What if It’s All Been a Big Fat Lie?” which saw print in 2002 in the New York Times Magazine. His book, Good Calories, Bad Calories: Challenging the Conventional Wisdom on Diet, Weight Control, and Disease, has just been released.

Related Posts

  1. 8 of 10 UC Berkeley: Gary Taubes 11/7/2007
  2. 5 of 10 UC Berkeley: Gary Taubes 11/7/2007
  3. 4 of 10 UC Berkeley: Gary Taubes 11/7/2007
  4. 3 of 10 UC Berkeley: Gary Taubes 11/7/2007
  5. 2 of 10 UC Berkeley: Gary Taubes 11/7/2007
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

7 Responses to “1 of 10 UC Berkeley: Gary Taubes 11/7/2007”

  1. lazur1 says:

    How do we explain Dr.Doug Graham’s “80/10/10″ , (80%carbs), raw-fooders, who eat all they want within these guidelines . If anything, most of them seem too thin but are , in fact, usually very high-energy & quite strong.

  2. SeanKimpton says:

    @lazur1

    There is no obligation to explain this. You have to first prove, with double blind experiments, that your assertion is true. Untill you do that, it is far removed from being a fact.

  3. lazur1 says:

    @SeanK Invoking science & doing it are 2 different things. A popuiation larger than most ’scientific’ smaples has a diet claimed to cause over-fatness & diabetes, are consistently NOT over-fat nor diabetic. Good enough for me. I can’t read every word of every experiment, but many double-blind papers I HAVE read contain contradictions between results & conclusions, too-small samples, & loose controls. Read Princeton’s HFCS paper, it contains all of these problems.

  4. SeanKimpton says:

    @lazur1 You are missing the point. I can not accept your claim without evidence. I have not heard of “Dr.Doug Graham’s “80/10/10″ , (80%carbs), raw-fooders”. You first have to proove to me they exist. Once you have done that, you still have to provide evicence that they are heathly (being skinny is not the same as been fit and healthy).

  5. lazur1 says:

    @SeanKimpton Prove it on a youtube forum? All I can do is possibly get fellow posters interested: The material’s not hard to find. Princeton didn’t publish their HFCS paper on a youtube forum: Just folks regurgitating conclusions from the news.

  6. SeanKimpton says:

    @lazur1 Okay, I just checked out some info on this diet. I don’t see a problem. Taubes’ thesis is that refined carbs makes us fat. This sort of food is clearly discouraged within the 80/10/10 raw framework. Contradiction resolved.

  7. zahmac01 says:

    @lazur1, Those raw-fooders must be Insulin Resistant and not store excess fat. When you pair a high carb diet with an Insulin Sensitive liver, then you will start to store fat.
    Google: Dr. Scott Connelly CrossFit
    Watch the three 30 minute videos and be awwed

Leave a Reply