Comments on: 1 of 10 UC Berkeley: Gary Taubes 11/7/2007 http://www.pritikinrecipes.com/1-of-10-uc-berkeley-gary-taubes-1172007.php Healthy Living With Pritikin Recipes Sat, 31 Dec 2011 02:42:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: zahmac01 http://www.pritikinrecipes.com/1-of-10-uc-berkeley-gary-taubes-1172007.php/comment-page-1#comment-1534 zahmac01 Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:47:13 +0000 http://www.pritikinrecipes.com/1-of-10-uc-berkeley-gary-taubes-1172007.php#comment-1534 @lazur1, Those raw-fooders must be Insulin Resistant and not store excess fat. When you pair a high carb diet with an Insulin Sensitive liver, then you will start to store fat. Google: Dr. Scott Connelly CrossFit Watch the three 30 minute videos and be awwed @lazur1, Those raw-fooders must be Insulin Resistant and not store excess fat. When you pair a high carb diet with an Insulin Sensitive liver, then you will start to store fat.
Google: Dr. Scott Connelly CrossFit
Watch the three 30 minute videos and be awwed

]]> By: SeanKimpton http://www.pritikinrecipes.com/1-of-10-uc-berkeley-gary-taubes-1172007.php/comment-page-1#comment-1535 SeanKimpton Sat, 03 Apr 2010 20:37:07 +0000 http://www.pritikinrecipes.com/1-of-10-uc-berkeley-gary-taubes-1172007.php#comment-1535 @lazur1 Okay, I just checked out some info on this diet. I don't see a problem. Taubes' thesis is that refined carbs makes us fat. This sort of food is clearly discouraged within the 80/10/10 raw framework. Contradiction resolved. @lazur1 Okay, I just checked out some info on this diet. I don’t see a problem. Taubes’ thesis is that refined carbs makes us fat. This sort of food is clearly discouraged within the 80/10/10 raw framework. Contradiction resolved.

]]> By: lazur1 http://www.pritikinrecipes.com/1-of-10-uc-berkeley-gary-taubes-1172007.php/comment-page-1#comment-1536 lazur1 Sat, 03 Apr 2010 20:10:26 +0000 http://www.pritikinrecipes.com/1-of-10-uc-berkeley-gary-taubes-1172007.php#comment-1536 @SeanKimpton Prove it on a youtube forum? All I can do is possibly get fellow posters interested: The material's not hard to find. Princeton didn't publish their HFCS paper on a youtube forum: Just folks regurgitating conclusions from the news. @SeanKimpton Prove it on a youtube forum? All I can do is possibly get fellow posters interested: The material’s not hard to find. Princeton didn’t publish their HFCS paper on a youtube forum: Just folks regurgitating conclusions from the news.

]]> By: SeanKimpton http://www.pritikinrecipes.com/1-of-10-uc-berkeley-gary-taubes-1172007.php/comment-page-1#comment-1537 SeanKimpton Sat, 03 Apr 2010 19:28:22 +0000 http://www.pritikinrecipes.com/1-of-10-uc-berkeley-gary-taubes-1172007.php#comment-1537 @lazur1 You are missing the point. I can not accept your claim without evidence. I have not heard of "Dr.Doug Graham's "80/10/10" , (80%carbs), raw-fooders". You first have to proove to me they exist. Once you have done that, you still have to provide evicence that they are heathly (being skinny is not the same as been fit and healthy). @lazur1 You are missing the point. I can not accept your claim without evidence. I have not heard of “Dr.Doug Graham’s “80/10/10″ , (80%carbs), raw-fooders”. You first have to proove to me they exist. Once you have done that, you still have to provide evicence that they are heathly (being skinny is not the same as been fit and healthy).

]]> By: lazur1 http://www.pritikinrecipes.com/1-of-10-uc-berkeley-gary-taubes-1172007.php/comment-page-1#comment-1538 lazur1 Sat, 03 Apr 2010 17:26:30 +0000 http://www.pritikinrecipes.com/1-of-10-uc-berkeley-gary-taubes-1172007.php#comment-1538 @SeanK Invoking science & doing it are 2 different things. A popuiation larger than most 'scientific' smaples has a diet claimed to cause over-fatness & diabetes, are consistently NOT over-fat nor diabetic. Good enough for me. I can't read every word of every experiment, but many double-blind papers I HAVE read contain contradictions between results & conclusions, too-small samples, & loose controls. Read Princeton's HFCS paper, it contains all of these problems. @SeanK Invoking science & doing it are 2 different things. A popuiation larger than most ‘scientific’ smaples has a diet claimed to cause over-fatness & diabetes, are consistently NOT over-fat nor diabetic. Good enough for me. I can’t read every word of every experiment, but many double-blind papers I HAVE read contain contradictions between results & conclusions, too-small samples, & loose controls. Read Princeton’s HFCS paper, it contains all of these problems.

]]> By: SeanKimpton http://www.pritikinrecipes.com/1-of-10-uc-berkeley-gary-taubes-1172007.php/comment-page-1#comment-1539 SeanKimpton Fri, 02 Apr 2010 22:19:59 +0000 http://www.pritikinrecipes.com/1-of-10-uc-berkeley-gary-taubes-1172007.php#comment-1539 @lazur1 There is no obligation to explain this. You have to first prove, with double blind experiments, that your assertion is true. Untill you do that, it is far removed from being a fact. @lazur1

There is no obligation to explain this. You have to first prove, with double blind experiments, that your assertion is true. Untill you do that, it is far removed from being a fact.

]]> By: lazur1 http://www.pritikinrecipes.com/1-of-10-uc-berkeley-gary-taubes-1172007.php/comment-page-1#comment-1540 lazur1 Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:59:43 +0000 http://www.pritikinrecipes.com/1-of-10-uc-berkeley-gary-taubes-1172007.php#comment-1540 How do we explain Dr.Doug Graham's "80/10/10" , (80%carbs), raw-fooders, who eat all they want within these guidelines . If anything, most of them seem too thin but are , in fact, usually very high-energy & quite strong. How do we explain Dr.Doug Graham’s “80/10/10″ , (80%carbs), raw-fooders, who eat all they want within these guidelines . If anything, most of them seem too thin but are , in fact, usually very high-energy & quite strong.

]]>